« Previous
Next »
International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume 15, Issue 2
, Pages 129-136
, April 2006
Up-down studies: responding to dosing!
References
- . Determination of the minimum local analgesic concentrations of epidural bupivacaine and lidocaine in labor. Anesth Analg. 1995;81:833–837
- . Clinical trials: Up-down sequential allocation. In: Reynolds F editors. Obstetric Anaesthesia – Millenium Update. London: Springer-Verlag; 2000;p. 157–165
- . Determination of the minimum local analgesic concentration of epidural chloroprocaine hydrochloride in labor. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1997;6:39–42
- . Does the left hand know what the right hand is doing? An appraisal of single enantiomer local anaesthetics. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1997;6:257–269
- . Ropivacaine and bupivacaine: Concentrating on dosing!. Anesth Analg. 2003;96:1251–1253
- . Epidural pain relief in labour; bupivacaine sparing by epidural fentanyl is dose dependent. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78:493–497
- . Dose dependent reduction of the minimum local analgesic concentration (MLAC) of bupivacaine by sufentanil for epidural analgesia in labor. Anesthesiology. 1998;89:626–632
- . Effect of epidural fentanyl on the minimum local analgesic concentration of epidural chloroprocaine in labor. Anesth Analg. 1996;83:987–990
- . Minimum local analgesic dose of plain ropivacaine vs. ropivacaine combined with sufentanil during epidural analgesia for labour. Anaesthesia. 2001;56:526–529
- . Levobupivacaine for extradural analgesia in labour: the sparing effect of epidural fentanyl. Anesth Analg. 2001;92:410–414
- . The effect of clonidine on the minimum local analgesic concentration of epidural ropivacaine during labor. Anesth Analg. 2002;95:735–740
- . Effect of epidural epinephrine on the minimum local analgesic concentration (MLAC) of epidural bupivacaine in labor. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:1123–1128
- . Effect of intravenous versus epidural fentanyl on the minimum local analgesic concentration of epidural bupivacaine in labor. Anesthesiology. 2000;93:122–128
- . Epidural fentanyl produces analgesia by a spinal mechanism. Anesthesiology. 1998;88:1519–1523
- The site of action of epidural fentanyl infusions in the presence of local anesthetics: A minimum local analgesic concentration infusion study in nulliparous labor. Anesth Analg. 2003;97:1439–1445
- . Minimum analgesic doses of fentanyl and sufentanil for epidural analgesia in the first stage of labor. Anesth Analg. 2003;96:1178–1182
- . The minimum local analgesic dose (MLAD) of intrathecal bupivacaine in labour and the effect of intrathecal fentanyl. Anesthesiology. 2001;94:593–598
- . A comparison of intrathecal fentanyl and sufentanil for labor analgesia. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:1070–1073
- . Dose, concentration and volume: A triangulated circular argument!. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1998;7:64–65
- . Is the mode of action of epidural diamorphine (3,6-diacetylmorphine) concentration dependant when used as analgesia for labour?. Br J Anaesth. 2005;94:229–233
- . The relative motor blocking potencies of intrathecal ropivacaine: Effects of concentration. Anesth Analg. 2004;98:1779–1782
- . Minimum local analgesic concentration of bupivacaine increases with progression of labour. Br J Anaesth. 1998;80:11–13
- . Minimum Local Analgesic Concentration of Bupivacaine in Labor; a Metanalysis. Proc SOAP. 1997;A125
- . Comparison of the minimum local analgesic concentrations (MLAC) of bupivacaine for nulliparous and multiparous women in labor. Anesthesiology. 2002;96(Suppl 1):P-54
- . Determination of the minimum local anaesthetic concentration (MLAC) of epidural levobupivacaine in nulliparous and multiparous women in labour. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2003;20:A575
- . Minimum analgesic dose of epidural sufentanil for first-stage labor analgesia: a comparison between spontaneous and prostaglandin-induced labors in nulliparous women. Anesthesiology. 2001;94:740–744
- . Local anesthetic requirements are greater in dystocia than in normal labor. Anesthesiology. 2003;98:957–963
- . Relative potencies of bupivacaine and ropivacaine for analgesia in labour. Br J Anaesth. 1999;82:371–373
- . Relative analgesic potencies of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for epidural analgesia in labor: Implications for therapeutic indexes. Anesthesiology. 1999;90:944–950
- . Is ropivacaine less potent than bupivacaine?. Anesthesiology. 1999;90:941–943
- . Acute toxicity of ropivacaine compared with that of bupivacaine. Anesth Analg. 1989;69:563–569
- . Central nervous and cardiovascular effects of i.v. infusions of ropivacaine, bupivacaine and placebo in volunteers. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78:507–514
- . Extradural pain relief in labour: potencies of levobupivacaine and racemic bupivacaine. Br J Anaesth. 1998;81:899–901
- . Relative analgesic potencies of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine for epidural analgesia in labor. Anesthesiology. 2003;99:1354–1358
- . A randomized sequential allocation study to determine the minimum effective analgesic concentration of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine in patients receiving epidural analgesia for labor. Anesthesiology. 2003;99:1383–1386
- . Relative analgesic potencies of ropivacaine, levobupivacaine and bupivacaine for epidural analgesia during labour. International Monitor of Regional Anaesthesia. 2002;14:A167
- . In Reply: Is the minimum local analgesic concentration method robust enough?. Anesthesiology. 2004;101:550–551
- . Relative motor blocking potencies of epidural bupivacaine and ropivacaine in labor. Anesth Analg. 2002;95:204–208
- . Relative motor blocking potencies of bupivacaine and levobupivacaine in labor. Anesth Analg. 2003;97:1509–1513
- . Epidural test dose with levobupivacaine and ropivacaine: determination of the ED50 for motor block after spinal administration. Br J Anaesth. 2004;92:850–853
- . Minimum local analgesic doses of ropivacaine, levobupivacaine and bupivacaine for intrathecal labor analgesia. Anesthesiology. 2005;102:646–650
- Epidural analgesia with 0.15% ropivacaine plus sufentanil 0.5 microgram ml−1 versus 0.10% bupivacaine plus sufentanil 0.5 microgram ml−1: a double-blind comparison during labour. Br J Anaesth. 2002;88:809–813
- . Ropivacaine 0.15% plus sufentanil 0.5 microg/mL and ropivacaine 0.10% plus sufentanil 0.5 microg/mL are equivalent for patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor. Anesth Analg. 2003;96:1173–1177
- . Comparision of ropivacaine 0.5% (in glucose 5%) with bupivacaine 0.5% (in glucose 8%) for spinal anaesthesia for elective surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2003;90:304–308
- . The central nervous system and cardiovascular effects of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine in healthy volunteers. Anesth Analg. 2003;97:412–416
- . Efficiency and accuracy of up-down vs. random allocation to determine analgesic potency and dose response. Anesthesiology SOAP Abstract Supplement. 2005;102:A-24
- . Evaluation of S1 motor block to determine a safe, reliable test dose for epidural analgesia. Br J Anaesth. 2002;89:442–445
- . An isobolographic analysis of epidural diamoprhine and levobupivacaine in early labour. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95:566–579
- . Cardiac arrest following regional anesthesia with ropivacaine: Here we go again!. Anesthesiology. 2003;99:1253–1254
- . Local anaesthetic agents. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine. 2001;2:288–291
- Data obtained via the PubMed Database available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?DB=pubmed.
- Ropivacaine 0.075% and bupivacaine 0.075% with fentanyl 2 microg/mL are equivalent for labor epidural analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2002;94:179–183
- A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing bupivacaine with ropivacaine for labor analgesia. Anesthesiology. 2003;98:1431–1435
- Comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes with epidural bupivacaine plus fentanyl and ropivacaine plus fentanyl for labor analgesia. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2005;14:288–293
- A multicentre trial comparing different concentrations of ropivacaine plus sufentanil with bupivacaine plus sufentanil for patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labour. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004;21:38–45
PII: S0959-289X(05)00192-5
doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.09.010
© 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume 15, Issue 2
, Pages 129-136
, April 2006
