Maternal autonomy: ethics and the law

References 

1. Gallagher J. Prenatal invasions and interventions: What’s wrong with fetal rights. Harv Women’s Law J. 1987;10:9–58
2. Saunders TA, Stein DJ, Dilger JP. Informed consent for labor epidurals: a survey of Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology anesthesiologists from the United States. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2006;15:
3. Weiniger CF, Elchalal U, Sprung CL, Weissman C, Matot I. Holy Consent – a dilemma for medical staff when maternal consent is withheld for emergency caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2006;15:
4. Chen K-H, Liu C-C, Yang C-H, et al. Anesthetic management of a pregnant living related liver donor. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2006;15:
5. Shanner L. Pregnancy intervention and models of maternal-fetal relationship: philosophical reflections on the Winnipeg C.F.S. dissent. Alberta Law Review. 1998;36:751–767
6. In re MB [1997] 2 FLR 426, CA.
7. Winnipeg Child and Family Services v. G [1997] 3 S.C.R. 925.
8. Dobson v Dobson [1999] 2 S.C.R. 753.
9. In re A.C., 573 A. 2d 1235 (D.C.App. 1990).
10. Kolder VE, Gallagher J, Parsons MT. Court ordered obstetrical interventions. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:1192–1196
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
11. Jefferson v Griffin, 274 S.E. 2d 457 (Ga. 1981).
12. Holdcroft A. Women’s autonomy in childbirth (letter). BMJ. 1997;315:488
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
13. Reid MC, Gillett G. The case of Medea - A view of fetal-maternal conflict. J Med Ethics. 1997;23:19–25
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
14. Nelson LJ, Milliken N. Compelled medical treatment of pregnant women - life, liberty and law in conflict. JAMA. 1988;259:1060–1066
    • MEDLINE