International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume 15, Issue 4 , Pages 273-278, October 2006

Ultra-low dose combined spinal-epidural anesthesia with intrathecal bupivacaine 3.75 mg for cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial

  • W.H.L. Teoh

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to: Dr. Wendy H.L. Teoh MBBS, FANZCA, Department of Women’s Anesthesia, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore 229899. Tel.: +65 6394 1081; fax: +65 6291 2661.
  • ,
  • E. Thomas
  • ,
  • H.M. Tan

Department of Women’s Anesthesia, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore

Accepted 1 March 2006.

Wendy H.L. Teoh MBBS, FANZCA, Easaw Thomas MBBS, FANZCA, FAMS, Hsiao Ming Tan MBBS, MMed Anesthesia, Department of Women’s Anesthesia, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore.

Background

We wished to investigate the feasibility of an ultra low-dose combined spinal-epidural technique in providing surgical anesthesia for uncomplicated cesarean deliveries in a randomized, double-blind controlled trial.

Method

Forty-four normotensive, non-obese patients were randomized to receive either intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine 3.75 mg (low dose group, n=22) or 9 mg (conventional group, n=22), in addition to intrathecal fentanyl 25 μg, morphine 100 μg, and epidural 1.5% lidocaine 3 mL. Sensorimotor anesthesia and hemodynamic data were assessed at 2.5-min intervals for the first 15 min.

Results

The maximal sensory block achieved in the low-dose group was significantly lower than that in the conventional group (median T3, [range T2-T6] vs. T2 [C2-T6], P<0.001) with a longer time taken to reach maximal sensory block. The low-dose group had less motor block, faster sensory regression to T10 dermatome and faster motor recovery to Bromage 0 (all P<0.001). The block failed to reach T6 bilaterally within 10 min in one patient in the low-dose group and two in the conventional group, with no significant difference in the need for epidural supplementation before or after delivery of the baby. The low-dose group experienced less hypotension (14% vs. 73%, P<0.001) with less ephedrine usage (0.68 vs. 17.5 mg, P<0.001). There was no difference in operating conditions and other side effects (shivering, pruritus).

Conclusion

We conclude that this technique results in a significantly lower incidence of maternal hypotension and has a role in high-risk parturients in whom maintenance of stable hemodynamics is imperative.

Keywords: Low dose spinal anesthesia, Combined spinal-epidural, Regional anesthesia, Cesarean, Hypotension

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0959-289X(06)00046-X

doi:10.1016/j.ijoa.2006.03.004

International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume 15, Issue 4 , Pages 273-278, October 2006