International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume 15, Issue 4 , Pages 279-283, October 2006

A randomised trial comparing 5 mL/kg and 10 mL/kg of pentastarch as a volume preload before spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section

  • P. Davies

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to: Dr Polly Davies, Dept of Anaesthetics, Northampton General Hospital, Billing Road, Northampton NN1 5BD, UK. Tel.: +44 1604 545671.
  • ,
  • G.W.G. French

Northampton General Hospital, Northampton, UK

Accepted 1 March 2006.

P. Davies, Dr, Dept of Anaesthetics, Northampton General Hospital, Billing Road, Northampton NN1 5BD, UK, G.W.G. French, Northampton General Hospital, Billing Road, Northampton NN1 5BD, UK.

Background

Colloid solutions are more effective at preventing hypotension than crystalloids when used as a volume preload before caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia. The ideal volume to infuse has not been established.

Method

In a randomised double-blind trial 70 women presenting for elective caesarean section received either 5 mL/kg of pentastarch (group A) or 10 mL/kg of pentastarch (group B) as a volume preload before spinal anaesthesia. Hypotension was defined as a systolic pressure below 90 mmHg or a decrease of 30% from a baseline value. Treatment was with 6-mg increments of ephedrine until resolution.

Results

In group B, 7/35 patients (20%) developed hypotension, significantly fewer than the 15/35 (42.8%) in group A (P<0.05). The patients in group B also required less ephedrine (total in group, 114 mg) than those in group A (total in group, 198 mg)

Conclusions

Pentastarch, 10 mL/kg is more effective than 5 mL/kg at preventing hypotension following spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery.

Keywords: Anaesthesia, obstetric, Anaesthetic technique, spinal, Complications, hypotension, Fluids, intravenous

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0959-289X(06)00096-3

doi:10.1016/j.ijoa.2006.03.009

International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume 15, Issue 4 , Pages 279-283, October 2006