International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume 15, Issue 4 , Pages 303-305 , October 2006

Women should be told ALL risks before regional anaesthesia is performed

References 

  1. Consent for Anaesthesia. 2006. The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.
  2. Confidential Enquiries into Maternal and Child Health . Why Mothers Die 2000-2002: The Sixth Report of the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Death in the United Kingdom. London: RCOG Press; 2004;www.cemach.org.uk
  3. Obstetric anaesthetic delays and complications. Confidential Enquiry into Stillbirths and Deaths in Infancy 2000 (7th annual report).
  4. Malenka DJ, Baron JA, Johansen S. The framing effect of relative and absolute risk. J Gen Intern Med. 1993;8:543–548
  5. Reynolds F. Auditing of complications of regional analgesia in obstetrics. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1998;7:1–4
  6. www.drfoster.co.uk.
  7. Ross B. ASA closed claims in obstetrics: lessons learned. Anesthesiology Clinics in North America. 2003;21:183–197
  8. Kelly GD, Blunt C, Moore PAS, Lewis M. Consent for regional anaesthesia in the United Kingdom: what is material risk?. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2004;13:71–74
  9. Obstetric Anaesthetists Association. Pain Relief in Labour Leaflet. www.oaa-secretariat@anaes.ac.uk.
  10. Obstetric Anaesthetists Association. Caesarean section: your choice of anaesthesia Leaflet.www.oaa-secretariat@anaes.ac.uk.

PII: S0959-289X(06)00116-6

doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2006.07.002

International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume 15, Issue 4 , Pages 303-305 , October 2006