International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume 16, Issue 1 , Pages 63-67, January 2007

Anaphylactic reactions during cesarean section

  • G. Draisci

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Allergology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore – Policlinico “A. Gemelli,” Rome, Italy
  • ,
  • E. Nucera

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Allergology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore – Policlinico “A. Gemelli,” Rome, Italy
  • ,
  • E. Pollastrini

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Allergology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore – Policlinico “A. Gemelli,” Rome, Italy
  • ,
  • E. Forte

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Allergology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore – Policlinico “A. Gemelli,” Rome, Italy
  • ,
  • B. Zanfini

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Allergology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore – Policlinico “A. Gemelli,” Rome, Italy
  • ,
  • R. Pinto

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Allergology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore – Policlinico “A. Gemelli,” Rome, Italy
  • ,
  • G. Patriarca

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Allergology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore – Policlinico “A. Gemelli,” Rome, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to: Prof. Giampiero Patriarca, Department of Allergology - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Policlinico “A. Gemelli” - Largo A. Gemelli, 8 - 00168 Rome, Italy. Fax: +39 06 3051343.
  • ,
  • D. Schiavino

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Allergology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore – Policlinico “A. Gemelli,” Rome, Italy
  • ,
  • D. Pietrini

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Allergology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore – Policlinico “A. Gemelli,” Rome, Italy

Accepted 1 August 2006. published online 26 November 2006.

Summary 

Sensitization to latex seems to occur more frequently in women than in men. Obstetric and gynecological surgical procedures have recently been shown to be a common setting for latex anaphylaxis. We analyzed all the cases of anaphylactic reactions during 1240 cesarean sections in 2004; the patients were questioned for risk factors and underwent allergy testing for drugs and latex. Four patients had anaphylaxis under spinal anesthesia and in all cases it was due to latex allergy. Reported symptoms included facial edema, profuse sweating, itching, generalized erythematous rash and hypotension. Only one patient manifested a severe reaction which included bronchospasm, dyspnea, tachypnea and anaphylactic shock, requiring orotracheal intubation and epinephrine. Our data showed a high incidence (1:310) of intraoperative latex anaphylactic reactions in the one-year study period. This may be related to the very specific population (all women) in a very specific setting (obstetrics). To prevent anaphylactic reactions during obstetric surgery it is important to identify potential risk factors to include, for example atopy, adverse reactions to foods and latex items. If latex allergy is confirmed or strongly suspected, patients should be managed in a latex-safe environment. Premedication with antihistamines and steroids might be useful to further reduce the risk. After the delivery, specific desensitization may represent a good therapeutic option.

Keywords: Cesarean section, Intraoperative anaphylaxis, Latex allergy, Obstetric procedures, Risk factors

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0959-289X(06)00142-7

doi:10.1016/j.ijoa.2006.08.006

International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume 16, Issue 1 , Pages 63-67, January 2007