International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume 16, Issue 2 , Pages 116-121, April 2007

Local infiltration of epinephrine-containing lidocaine with bicarbonate reduces superficial bleeding and pain during labor epidural catheter insertion: a randomized trial☆☆

  • B. Carvalho

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to: Brendan Carvalho MB, BCh, FRCA, Department of Anesthesia, H3580, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA. Tel.: +1 650 861 8607; fax: +1 650 725 8544.
  • ,
  • A. Fuller
  • ,
  • C. Brummel
  • ,
  • S.E. Cohen

Department of Anesthesia, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA

Accepted 1 September 2006. published online 07 February 2007.

B. Carvalho MB, BCh, FRCA, and S.E. Cohen MB, Ch.B, FRCA, Department of Anesthesia, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; A. Fuller MD, Current affiliation: Private practice, Northern Colorado Anesthesia Professional Consultants, Fort Collins, Colorado; C. Brummel MD, Current affiliation: Private practice, Colorado Permanente Medical Group, Denver, Colorado, USA.

Background

Superficial bleeding after labor epidural catheter placement is a common phenomenon. In addition to delaying securing the epidural catheter, it may loosen the adhesive catheter dressing. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether skin infiltration with epinephrine-containing rather than plain lidocaine reduces superficial bleeding after catheter placement. Secondary objectives were to determine whether adding epinephrine and/or sodium bicarbonate affected infiltration pain.

Methods

After institutional review board approval and informed consent, 80 healthy women receiving epidural analgesia during labor were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to four local anesthetic mixtures (n=20 in each group): group L: lidocaine 1.5%, group LB: lidocaine 1.5% with 8.4% sodium bicarbonate, group LE: lidocaine 1.5% with epinephrine 1:200000, and group LEB: lidocaine 1.5% with epinephrine 1:200000 and 8.4% sodium bicarbonate. Clinical endpoints included the amount of superficial bleeding at the catheter site, pain during local anesthetic infiltration and epidural catheter movement during labor.

Results

Demographic data were similar among the groups. The addition of epinephrine to lidocaine significantly reduced superficial bleeding. Solutions containing epinephrine were well tolerated and caused no cardiovascular disturbances. The addition of epinephrine did not increase pain, while bicarbonate reduced it [verbal score (scale 0-10) 3.6±2.2 vs. 2.6±1.8; P=0.04]. There were no differences in epidural catheter movement among the groups; no catheters became displaced during labor.

Conclusion

Local infiltration of epinephrine-containing lidocaine before epidural catheter insertion reduces superficial bleeding and the addition of bicarbonate decreases pain during skin infiltration.

Keywords: Local anesthesia, Epinephrine, Bicarbonate, Labor epidural

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The study was conducted at Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital and Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California and funded internally by the Department of Anesthesia, Stanford University School of Medicine.

☆☆ Findings from this study were presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology (SOAP), May 2005, Palm Springs, California.

PII: S0959-289X(06)00196-8

doi:10.1016/j.ijoa.2006.09.006

International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume 16, Issue 2 , Pages 116-121, April 2007