International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume 16, Issue 4 , Pages 316-322, October 2007

Survey of obstetric providers’ views on the anesthetic risks of maternal obesity

  • J.M. Mhyre

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to: J.M. Mhyre, MD, University of Michigan Health System, Department of Anesthesiology, 1H247 UH Box 0048, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0048, USA. Tel.: +734 763 2436; fax: +734 763 6651.
  • ,
  • M.L.V.H. Greenfield
  • ,
  • L.S. Polley

Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Obstetric Anesthesiology, Women’s Hospital, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Accepted 2 February 2007. published online 28 July 2007.

Background

Maternal obesity is increasing in prevalence and associated with numerous complications. Surveys document that obstetricians recognize the obstetric and perinatal health risks of maternal obesity. To determine if they recognize the anesthetic risks and discuss them antenatally with obese patients, we surveyed all obstetric providers at a university-affiliated obstetric unit.

Methods

The survey listed complications of obesity and pregnancy sampled from the literature, including eight anesthetic complications, ten prenatal obstetric complications, ten intrapartum or postpartum obstetric complications, five medical complications and five neonatal complications. Respondents reported if and when they routinely discuss each. Reported routine discussion rates were averaged across respondents and complication categories. We postulated that anesthetic aspects would be discussed less frequently than others.

Results

Thirty-six of the 55 obstetric providers responded (65.5%). On average, anesthetic complications were discussed during prenatal care 13.5% of the time, less often than prenatal obstetric complications (48.5%, Wilcoxon signed rank test, P<0.0001), intrapartum or postpartum obstetric complications (40.0%, Wilcoxon signed rank test, P<0.0001) and medical complications (35.0%, Wilcoxon signed rank test, P=0.0001). The survey failed to demonstrate a statistically significant difference in the rate of discussion between anesthetic and neonatal complications (13.5% vs. 22.2%, Wilcoxon signed rank test, P=0.05). Twenty-four respondents reported that they did not routinely discuss any of the listed anesthetic complications with their obese patients in the prenatal period.

Conclusions

This preliminary study suggests that antenatal education about the anesthetic implications of obesity may not be part of routine prenatal care for obese pregnant women.

Keywords: Maternal obesity, Prenatal education, Survey

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was supported in part by the University of Michigan Department of Anesthesiology and the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program.

PII: S0959-289X(07)00054-4

doi:10.1016/j.ijoa.2007.03.001

International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume 16, Issue 4 , Pages 316-322, October 2007