International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume 16, Issue 4 , Pages 328-335, October 2007

Contraindications to regional anaesthesia in obstetrics: a survey of German practice

  • U.M. Stamer

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to: PD Dr. Ulrike M. Stamer, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25 53105 Bonn, Germany. Tel.: +49 228/287 14114; fax: +49 228/287 14125.
  • ,
  • F. Stuber
  • ,
  • R. Wiese
  • ,
  • H. Wulf
  • ,
  • T. Meuser

Departments of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Bonn, University of Marburg and Marien-Krankenhaus, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany

Accepted 1 May 2007. published online 15 August 2007.

UM Stamer, F Stuber, R Wiese, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Bonn, Germany, H Wulf, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Marburg, Germany, T Meuser, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Marien-Krankenhaus, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany.

Background

We assessed current practice regarding indications and contraindications to regional analgesia and anaesthesia for labour and delivery in Germany.

Methods

Questionnaires were mailed to the directors of 918 German departments of anaesthesiology.

Results

A total of 397 completed replies were received representing 41.3% of all deliveries in Germany. More than half of the respondents never perform spinal or epidural anaesthesia when the platelet count falls below 65×109/L. Preeclampsia, which was not graded for severity, was considered an absolute contraindication to regional block by 15% and placenta praevia by 30% of respondents. If a woman had taken aspirin three days before, the numbers of respondents considering epidural anaesthesia contraindicated (40.2%) were nearly double those considering spinal anaesthesia contraindicated (21.7%) (P<0.001). For a platelet count of 79×109/L, epidural anaesthesia was thought to be contraindicated by 37% and spinal anaesthesia by 22.2% (P=0.001). In departments with <500 deliveries/year, reluctance to use regional blockade was more pronounced than in departments with >1000 deliveries/year.

Conclusion

Clinical practice varies considerably in Germany. Concerns regarding the use of regional blockade were more prevalent in hospitals with small delivery units. Indications and contraindications are not consistent in Germany and some recommendations or guidelines are needed.

Keywords: Survey, Obstetrics, Epidural analgesia, Spinal anaesthesia, Contraindications

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0959-289X(07)00113-6

doi:10.1016/j.ijoa.2007.05.011

International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume 16, Issue 4 , Pages 328-335, October 2007