International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume 17, Issue 2 , Pages 159-163 , April 2008

Acute normovolemic hemodilution, intraoperative cell salvage and PulseCO hemodynamic monitoring in a Jehovah’s Witness with placenta percreta

,Accepted 1 July 2007.

References 

  1. Rhodes A, Sunderland R. Arterial Pulse Power Analysis: The LiDCO System. In:  Pinsky MR,  Payen D editor. Functional Hemodynamic Monitoring Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 42. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2005;p. 183–192
  2. Thomas D (proposer), Clark V (opposer). Controversies in obstetric anesthesia: Facilities for blood salvage (cell saver technique) must be available in every obstetric theatre. Int J Obstet Anesth 2005; 14: 48–52.
  3. Waters J H, Santrach P J. Pro/con debate: Is cell salvage a safe technique for the obstetric patient?. SOAP Newsletter 2005; Fall: 7–9.
  4. Walters JH, Biscotti C, Potter PS, Phillipson E. Amniotic fluid removal during cell salvage in the cesarean section patient. Anesthesiology. 2000;92:1531–1535
  5. Potter PS, Walters JH, Burger GA, Mraovic B. Application of cell-salvage during cesarean section. Anesthesiology. 1999;90:619–621
  6. Estella NM, Berry DL, Baker BW, Wali A, Belfort MA. Normovolemic hemodilution before cesarean hysterectomy for placenta percreta. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90:669–670
  7. Michard F. Changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2005;103:419–428
  8. Davies GA, Tessier JL, Woodman MC, Lipson A, Hahn PM. Maternal hemodynamics after oxytocin bolus compared with infusion in the third stage of labor: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:294–299
  9. Balestrieri P. Maternal hemodynamics after oxytocin bolus compared with infusion in the third stage of labor (letter). Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:1486

PII: S0959-289X(07)00168-9

doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2007.07.005

International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume 17, Issue 2 , Pages 159-163 , April 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution