« Previous
Next »
International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume 17, Issue 3
, Pages 223-227
, July 2008
Estimation of the minimum motor blocking potency ratio for intrathecal bupivacaine and lidocaine
References
- . Determination of the minimum local analgesic concentrations of epidural bupivacaine and lidocaine in labor. Anesth Analg. 1995;81:833–837
- . Clinical trials: Up-down sequential allocation. In: Reynolds F editors. Obstetric Anaesthesia – Millenium Update. London: Springer-Verlag; 2000;p. 157–165
- . Relative potencies of bupivacaine and ropivacaine for analgesia in labour. Br J Anaesth. 1999;82:371–373
- . Relative analgesic potencies of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for epidural analgesia in labor: Implications for therapeutic indexes. Anesthesiology. 1999;90:944–950
- . Extradural pain relief in labour: potencies of levobupivacaine and racemic bupivacaine. Br J Anaesth. 1998;81:899–901
- . Relative analgesic potencies of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine for epidural analgesia in labor. Anesthesiology. 2003;99:1354–1358
- . A randomized sequential allocation study to determine the minimum effective analgesic concentration of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine in patients receiving epidural analgesia for labor. Anesthesiology. 2003;99:1383–1386
- . Relative motor blocking potencies of bupivacaine and levobupivacaine in labor. Anesth Analg. 2003;97:1509–1513
- . Epidural test dose with levobupivacaine and ropivacaine: determination of the ED50 for motor block after spinal administration. Br J Anaesth. 2004;92:850–853
- . Minimum local analgesic doses of ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, and bupivacaine for intrathecal labor analgesia. Anesthesiology. 2005;102:646–650
- The relative potency for motor block after intrathecal bupivacaine, ropivacaine and levobupivacaine. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:904–907
- . Up-down studies: responding to dosing!. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2006;15:129–136
- . Assessing bupivacaine 10 mg/fentanyl 20 μg as an intrathecal test dose. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2003;12:250–255
- . A comparison of the hydrochloride and carbon dioxide salt of lidocaine and prilocaine in epidural analgesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1965;15:55–69
- . Ambulatory analgesia in labour. In: Collis R, Plaat F, Urquat J editor. Textbook of obstetric anaesthesia. London: GMM Publ; 2002;p. 108
- . Introduction to statistical analysis. 4th ed.. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1983;428–39
- . Current issues in spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2001;94:888–906
- . Advances and limitations of up and down methodology. Anesthesiology. 2007;107:144–152
- . Is the minimum local analgesic concentration method robust enough?. Anesthesiology. 2004;101:550
- . Acute toxicity of ropivacaine compared with that of bupivacaine. Anesth Analg. 1989;69:563–569
- . Central nervous and cardiovascular effects of i.v. infusion of ropivacaine, bupivacaine and placebo in volunteers. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78:507–514
- . The central nervous system and cardiovascular effects of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine in healty volunteers. Anesth Analg. 2003;97:412–416
- . Minimum local analgesic concentration of bupivacaine increases with the progress of labour. Br J Anaesth. 1998;80:11–13
- . Quantitative assessment of motor block in labouring women receiving epidural analgesia. Anaesthesia. 2001;56:447–484
- . Motor blockade and EMG recordings in epidural anaesthesia. A comparison between mepivacaine 2%, bupivacaine 0.5% and etidocaine 1.5%. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1989;33:597–604
- . The epidural test dose: a review. Anesth Analg. 2006;102:921–929
- . Transient neurologic symptoms after spinal anesthesia with lidocaine versus other local anesthetics: a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Anesth Analg. 2005;100:1811–1816
- . Standard lidocaine epidural test dose: isn’t it too much?. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004;21:632A
PII: S0959-289X(08)00040-X
doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2007.05.015
© 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume 17, Issue 3
, Pages 223-227
, July 2008
