International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume 17, Issue 4 , Pages 298-303, October 2008

A prospective study of awareness and recall associated with general anaesthesia for caesarean section

School of Medicine and Pharmacology, The University of Western Australia and Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, King Edward Memorial Hospital for Women, Perth, Western Australia, Australia

Accepted 1 January 2008. published online 10 July 2008.

Abstract 

Background

The obstetric population is considered at high risk of awareness and recall when undergoing general anaesthesia for caesarean section. In recent years the incidence may have been altered by developments in obstetric anaesthesia.

Methods

A prospective observational study of general anaesthesia for caesarean section was conducted during 2005 and 2006 in 13 maternity hospitals dealing with approximately 49 500 deliveries per annum in Australia and New Zealand. As a component of this study the frequency of recall of intraoperative events was examined using a structured postoperative interview on two occasions.

Results

There were 1095 general anaesthetics surveyed with 47% being performed for urgent fetal delivery. Thiopental was the most common induction agent (83%) with sevoflurane being used for maintenance in 63%. In 32% of cases a depth-of-anaesthesia monitor was used. In 763 cases (70%) there was least one postoperative interview enquiring into dreaming and awareness. There were two cases deemed to be consistent with awareness (incidence 0.26%, CI 0.03-0.9%, or 1 in 382) and three cases of possible awareness.

Conclusion

Awareness with recall of intraoperative events remains a significant complication of obstetric general anaesthesia but was potentially avoidable in all cases detected in this study.

Keywords: Anaesthesia, general, Anaesthesia, caesarean section, Awareness, Recall

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was supported by a starting grant from the Australian and New Zealand College (ANZCA) Trials Group, followed by a 2006 project grant from ANZCA.

PII: S0959-289X(08)00048-4

doi:10.1016/j.ijoa.2008.01.016

International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume 17, Issue 4 , Pages 298-303, October 2008