International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume 18, Issue 1 , Pages 28-32, January 2009

A double-blind randomized controlled trial of patient-controlled epidural analgesia with or without a background infusion following initial spinal analgesia for labor pain

Presented in part at the annual meeting of ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists), Chicago, IL, October 2006.

  • T. Okutomi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology and Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to: Toshiyuki Okutomi, M.D., Department of Anesthesiology, Kitasato University, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 228-8555 Japan, Tel.: +81 42 778 8606; fax: +81 42 778 8441.
  • ,
  • M. Saito

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology and Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
  • ,
  • J. Mochizuki

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
  • ,
  • K. Amano

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
  • ,
  • S. Hoka

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology and Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan

Accepted 23 June 2008. published online 20 November 2008.

Abstract 

Background

Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) combined with spinal analgesia is an option for pain relief in labor. However, the effect of a CBI on the analgesic requirements of laboring women is still debated. This double-blind study investigated the effect of CBI with PCEA following spinal analgesia on the local anesthetic requirements of parturients during labor.

Methods

Sixty-six nulliparous women were randomly assigned to a standard PCEA protocol (5-mL demand bolus, 10-min lockout) with or without a CBI of 6 mL/h. The epidural solution consisted of 0.1% ropivacaine with fentanyl 2 μg/mL. Labor analgesia was initiated in both groups with intrathecal bupivacaine 2.5 mg plus fentanyl 25 μg. The number of demands per hour and the hourly dose of ropivacaine were calculated for both groups.

Results

The median [range] number of analgesic boluses per hour in the PCEA group that were demanded: 2.4 [0.8–12.2] and delivered: 1.6 [0.8–2.6], were significantly greater than those in the PCEA+CBI group: 0.7 [0.4–4.2] and 0.6 [0.2–1.3] (P 0.05). However, the hourly ropivacaine dose in the PCEA group (7.9 [3.9–13.2] mg/h) was not significantly different from that in the PCEA+CBI group (8.4 [6.0–12.5] mg/h).

Conclusion

In laboring nulliparous patients provided initial labor analgesia with spinal anesthesia, the use of a continuous background infusion decreases PCEA demand dosing, but not the total hourly amount of ropivacaine and fentanyl used.

Keywords: Background infusion, Combined-spinal epidural analgesia, Labor analgesia, Patient-controlled epidural analgesia

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0959-289X(08)00105-2

doi:10.1016/j.ijoa.2008.06.006

International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume 18, Issue 1 , Pages 28-32, January 2009