International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume 18, Issue 2 , Pages 137-141, April 2009

Observational study of continuous spinal anesthesia with the catheter-over-needle technique for cesarean delivery

Department of Anesthesia and Reanimation, La Paz Maternal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain

Accepted 3 November 2008. published online 04 February 2009.

Abstract 

Background

Few studies have assessed the efficacy and safety of continuous spinal anesthesia in obstetrics, although placement of a catheter in the intrathecal space theoretically offers advantages in these patients.

Methods

Ninety-two women scheduled for elective cesarean delivery using continuous spinal anesthesia with the catheter-over-needle technique (22- or 24-gauge Spinocath®) were included in the study. The doses of local anesthetic used, hemodynamic variables, use of ephedrine and other drugs, and incidence of complications such as technical failure and postdural puncture headache (PDPH) were recorded.

Results

The mean (±SD) dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine used was 8.2±1.8mg. The incidence of hypotension was 30% and the mean total dose of ephedrine was 4±7mg. The continuous spinal anesthetic technique failed in 18 women (20%). The overall incidence of post-dural-puncture headache was 29%; 18% of patients with post-dural-puncture headache required a blood patch.

Conclusions

Compared to previous reports, the incidence of block failure and PDPH in this study was unacceptably high and therefore the risks of the technique appear to outweigh the advantages of continuous spinal anesthesia in obstetric practice.

Keywords: Cesarean delivery, Spinal anesthesia, Continuous spinal anesthesia

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0959-289X(08)00159-3

doi:10.1016/j.ijoa.2008.11.001

International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume 18, Issue 2 , Pages 137-141, April 2009