International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume 18, Issue 2 , Pages 142-149, April 2009

Anaesthesia mode for caesarean section and mortality in very preterm infants: An epidemiologic study in the EPIPAGE cohort

  • V. Laudenbach

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neonatology and Pediatric Intensive Care & EA 4309 NeoVasc Research Group, Rouen Institute for Biomedical Research, University of Rouen, Rouen, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to: Vincent Laudenbach, M.D., Ph.D., Professor of Anesthesiology, Service de Pédiatrie Néonatale et Réanimation, CHU Charles Nicolle, 1 rue de Germont, 76031 Rouen Cedex, France.
  • ,
  • F.J. Mercier

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Antoine Béclère University Hospital, Clamart & University of Paris XI, France
  • ,
  • J.-C. Rozé

      Affiliations

    • Department of Perinatalogy, University Hospital, Nantes, France
  • ,
  • B. Larroque

      Affiliations

    • INSERM U149, Epidemiological Research Unit on Perinatal and Women’s Health, Villejuif, France
  • ,
  • P.-Y. Ancel

      Affiliations

    • INSERM U149, Epidemiological Research Unit on Perinatal and Women’s Health, Villejuif, France
  • ,
  • M. Kaminski

      Affiliations

    • INSERM U149, Epidemiological Research Unit on Perinatal and Women’s Health, Villejuif, France
  • ,
  • G. Bréart

      Affiliations

    • INSERM U149, Epidemiological Research Unit on Perinatal and Women’s Health, Villejuif, France
  • ,
  • P. Diemunsch

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
  • ,
  • D. Subtil

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Lille, France
  • ,
  • C. Lejus

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital, Nantes, France
  • ,
  • J. Fresson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neonatology, University Hospital, Nancy, France
  • ,
  • C. Arnaud

      Affiliations

    • INSERM U 558, Toulouse, France
  • ,
  • B. Rachet

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital, Rouen, France
  • ,
  • A. Burguet

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neonatology, University Hospital, Dijon, France
  • ,
  • G. Cambonie

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neonatology, University Hospital, Montpellier, France
  • ,
  • Epipage Study Group

      Affiliations

    • The EPIPAGE Study Group includes the following: B Larroque (national coordinator), PY Ancel, B Blondel, G Bréart, M Dehan, M Garel, M Kaminski, F Maillard, C du Mazaubrun, P Missy, K Supernant (INSERM U149, Paris, France);M Durand, J Matis, J Messer, A Treisser (Hôpital de Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France);A Burguet, L Abraham-Lerat, A Menget, P Roth, J-P Schaal, G Thiriez (University Hospital St Jacques, Besançon, France);C Lévêque, S Marret, L Marpeau (University Hospital Charles Nicolle, Rouen, France);P Boulot, J-C Picaud (University Hospital Arnaud de Villeneuve, Montpellier, France);A-M Donadio, B Ledésert (Regional Health Observatory of Montpellier, France);André, J. Fresson, JL Boutroy, JM Hascoët (University Regional Maternity, Nancy, France);C Arnaud, S Bourdet-Loubère, H Grandjean (INSERM U558, Toulouse, France);M Rolland (Children Hospital, Toulouse, France);C Leignel, P Lequien, V Pierrat, F Puech, D Subtil, P Truffert (University Hospital Jeanne de Flandre, Lille, France);G Boog, E Le Mauff, V Rouger-Bureau, J-C Rozé (University Mothers & Children Hospital, Nantes);P-Y Ancel, G Bréart, M Kaminski, C du Mazaubrun (INSERM U149, Paris, France), M Dehan, V Zupan (University Hospital Antoine Béclère, Clamart, France);M Vodovar, M Voyer (Institut de Puériculture, Paris, France).The EPIPAGE cohort study received financial support from the INSERM (Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale), Merck-Sharp, Dohme-Chivret, the FRM (Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale), and the Direction Générale de la Santé (French Ministry of Health).

Accepted 20 November 2008. published online 05 February 2009.

Abstract 

Background

Little is known about the influence of anaesthesia for caesarean section on outcome in very preterm infants.

Methods

A prospective, population-based, cohort study (the EPIPAGE cohort) included all births before 33 weeks in nine French regions in 1997. Of 2360 infants live-born between 27 and 32 weeks, 1338 were delivered by caesarean section with general anaesthesia (n=711, 53.1%), spinal anaesthesia (n=419, 31.3%), or epidural anaesthesia (n=208, 15.6%). Neonatal mortality was compared among these three groups using bi- (according to gestational age and to anaesthetic technique) and multivariate analyses.

Results

Neonatal mortality was 10.1% with general anaesthesia, 12.2% with spinal anaesthesia and 7.7% with epidural anaesthesia. After adjustment for gestational age and characteristics of pregnancy, delivery and neonate, spinal anaesthesia was associated with a higher risk of neonatal death than general anaesthesia (adjusted odds ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 2.6).

Conclusion

In this population-based study, spinal anaesthesia was associated with an increased risk of neonatal mortality in very preterm infants compared to general anaesthesia (and epidural anaesthesia), independently from gestational age and characteristics of the pregnancies, deliveries and neonates. Although this multivariate analysis does not prove a causal relationship, the results suggest it could exist, particularly if maternal haemodynamics are poorly controlled. With recent significant change in the conduct of spinal anaesthesia, further studies are needed to investigate potential harmful effects of anaesthesia on very preterm infants delivered by caesarean section.

Keywords: Caesarean section, Premature infants, Mortality, Anaesthesia, Obstetrical

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0959-289X(08)00181-7

doi:10.1016/j.ijoa.2008.11.005

International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume 18, Issue 2 , Pages 142-149, April 2009