« Previous
Next »
International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume 18, Issue 3
, Pages 231-236
, July 2009
Single-shot spinal anaesthesia, combined spinal-epidural and epidural volume extension for elective caesarean section: a randomized comparison
References
- . Anesthesia for obstetrics. In: Miller RD editors. Miller’s Anesthesia. 6th ed.. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2006;p. 2307–2344
- . Epidural volume extension and low-dose sequential combined spinal-epidural blockade: two ways to reduce spinal dose requirement for caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2007;16:346–353
- . Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia using epidural volume extension leads to faster motor recovery after elective cesarean delivery: a prospective, randomized, double blind study. Anesth Analg. 2004;98:810–814
- . Combined spinal epidural causes higher level of block than equivalent single-shot spinal anesthesia in elective cesarean patients. Anesth Analg. 2006;102:577–580
- . Mechanism of extension of spinal anaesthesia by extradural injection of local anaesthetic. Br J Anaesth. 1992;69:457–460
- . Effects of epidural injection on spinal block during combined spinal and epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2000;25:591–595
- . Epidural anesthesia for labor in an ambulatory patient. Anesth Analg. 1993;77:919–924
- . Combined spinal epidural does not cause a higher sensory block than single-shot spinal technique for cesarean delivery in laboring women. Anesth Analg. 2006;103:1540–1542
- . Sensorimotor anesthesia and hypotension after subarachnoid block: combined spinal-epidural versus single-shot spinal technique. Anesth Analg. 2004;98:491–496
- . The median effective dose of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine is larger in the single-shot spinal as compared with the combined spinal-epidural technique. Anesth Analg. 2005;100:1499–1502
- . Lumbosacral cerebrospinal fluid volume is the primary determinant of sensory block extent and duration during spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1998;89:24–29
- . Neuraxial blocks. In: Brown DL editors. Regional Anesthesia and Analgesia. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1996;p. 319–357
- . Effects of posture on the spread of isobaric and hyperbaric amethocaine. Br J Anaesth. 1981;53:273–278
- . Posture and the spread of hyperbaric bupivacaine in parturients using the combined spinal epidural technique. Can J Anaesth. 1993;40:943–946
- . The sitting versus right lateral position during combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery: block characteristics and severity of hypotension. Anesth Analg. 2006;102:243–247
- . The effect of posture and baricity on the spread of intrathecal bupivacaine for elective cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2005;100:1159–1165
- . Effect of delayed supine positioning after induction of spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002;46:441–446
- . The effect of maternal position during induction of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 1998;87:614–618
- . Combined spinal epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section: a randomized comparison of Oxford, lateral and sitting positions. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2002;11:190–195
- . A comparison of the lateral, Oxford and sitting positions for performing combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia for elective caesarean section. Anaesthesia. 2005;60:535–540
- . Sensory block extension during combined spinal and epidural. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1998;23:92–95
- . Epidural volume extension and intrathecal dose requirement: plain versus hyperbaric bupivacaine. Anesth Analg. 2008;107:333–338
- . The effect of epidural saline injection on analgesic level during combined spinal and epidural anesthesia assessed clinically and myelographically. Anesth Analg. 1997;85:1097–1100
- . The epidural “top-up” in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia: the effect of volume versus dose. Anesth Analg. 1999;88:810–814
PII: S0959-289X(09)00013-2
doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2009.01.007
© 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume 18, Issue 3
, Pages 231-236
, July 2009
