International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume 19, Issue 1 , Pages 24-30, January 2010

Maternal and neonatal effects of bolus administration of ephedrine and phenylephrine during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery: a randomised study

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjang Hospital, New Delhi, India

Accepted 10 February 2009. published online 10 August 2009.

Abstract 

Background

Maternal haemodynamic changes and neonatal well-being following bolus administration of ephedrine and phenylephrine were compared in 60 term parturients undergoing elective caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia.

Methods

In a randomised double-blind study, women received boluses of either ephedrine 6 mg (group E; n=30) or phenylephrine 100 μg (group P; n=30) whenever maternal systolic pressure was ⩽80% of baseline.

Results

Changes in systolic pressure were comparable in the two groups. There were no differences in the incidence of bradycardia (group E: 0% vs. group P: 16.7%; P>0.05), nausea (group E: 13% vs. group: P 0; P>0.05) and vomiting (group E: 3.3% vs. group P: 0; P>0.05). Umbilical artery (UA) pH (group E: 7.29 ± 0.04 vs. group P: 7.32 ± 0.04; P=0.01) and venous pH (group E: 7.34 ± 0.04 vs. group P: 7.38 ± 0.05; P=0.002) were significantly greater in group P than in group E. UA base excess was significantly less in group E (-2.83 ± 0.94 mEq/L) than in group P (-1.61 ± 1.04 mEq/L; P<0.001). Apgar scores at 1, 5 and 10min and neurobehavioural scores at 2-4 h, 24 h and 48 h were similar in the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusions

Phenylephrine 100 μg and ephedrine 6 mg had similar efficacy in the treatment of maternal hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean delivery. Neonates in group P had significantly higher umbilical arterial pH and base excess values than those in group E, which is consistent with other studies.

Keywords: Anaesthetic technique, spinal, Complication, hypotension, Drugs, ephedrine, phenylephrine

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0959-289X(09)00049-1

doi:10.1016/j.ijoa.2009.02.007

International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume 19, Issue 1 , Pages 24-30, January 2010