International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume 19, Issue 1 , Pages 31-37, January 2010

Satisfaction, control and pain relief: short- and long-term assessments in a randomised controlled trial of low-dose and traditional epidurals and a non-epidural comparison group

  • G.M. Cooper

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anaesthesia, Birmingham Women’s Hospital
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to: Dr Griselda Cooper, Department of Anaesthetics, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Queen Elizabeth Medical Centre, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK. B15 2TH. Tel.: +44 121 627 2060.
  • ,
  • C. MacArthur

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Birmingham
  • ,
  • M.J.A. Wilson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield
  • ,
  • P.A.S. Moore

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anaesthesia, Birmingham Women’s Hospital
  • ,
  • A. Shennan (on behalf of the COMET Study Group UK)

      Affiliations

    • Department of Reproduction and Endocrinology, Kings College London, St. Thomas Hospital, London, UK

Accepted 4 May 2009. published online 30 November 2009.

Abstract 

Background

Childbirth is an important life event for which a positive experience is important to many women.

Methods

As secondary outcomes from the randomised controlled Comparative Obstetric Mobile Epidural Trial, various aspects of satisfaction were assessed in women who had one of three types of regional analgesia (two of which were low-dose techniques and a high-dose control using 0.25% epidural bupivacaine) and a comparison group who did not have epidural analgesia, shortly after delivery and 12 months later.

Results

The predominant finding was satisfaction with spontaneous vaginal delivery whatever the mode of analgesia. The overall immediate and long-term satisfaction was similar for all three neuraxial techniques. Satisfaction with the speed of pain relief and the amount of mobility were significantly greater for the combined spinal-epidural technique compared with the low-dose infusion (P<0.001). The degree of control felt by women who had combined spinal-epidural analgesia was greater than with the high-dose (P<0.05). Women in the non-epidural comparison group did not report a greater feeling of control. Among those who delivered spontaneously, more women in the combined spinal-epidural group (30%) felt in full control compared with the high-dose group (17%) (P<0.05). By comparison 22% in the low-dose infusion group and only 15% who had no epidural felt in full control.

Conclusions

Whilst satisfaction with the experience of childbirth appears intimately related to the attainment of a spontaneous delivery, mobile epidurals enhance women’s feeling of control in labour and are popular for future choice of regional analgesia.

Keywords: Analgesia: obstetric, epidural, low dose and traditional, Satisfaction: analgesia, control, mode of delivery

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Presented in part at the Society for Obstetric Anesthesiology and Perinatology Annual Scientific Meeting, Phoenix, Arizona, USA, May, 2003.

PII: S0959-289X(09)00116-2

doi:10.1016/j.ijoa.2009.05.004

International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume 19, Issue 1 , Pages 31-37, January 2010