Volume 19, Issue 1 , Pages 56-60, January 2010
Reduction of severity of pruritus after elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia with subarachnoid morphine: a randomised comparison of prophylactic granisetron and ondansetron
Abstract
Background
The incidence of pruritus after elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia with subarachnoid morphine may be 60-100%, and is a common cause of maternal dissatisfaction. Ondansetron has been shown to reduce pruritus but the effect is short-lived. The objective of this randomized double-blind trial was to evaluate the anti-pruritic efficacy of granisetron compared with ondansetron.
Methods
Eighty ASA I or II women undergoing elective caesarean section received spinal anaesthesia with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine10
mg, fentanyl 25
μg and preservative-free morphine 150
μg. After delivery of the baby and clamping of the umbilical cord, they were randomised to receive granisetron 3
mg i.v. (group G) or ondansetron 8
mg i.v. (group O).
Results
The two groups were similar for age, gestational age, height and weight. According to visual analogue pruritus scores, patients in group G experienced less pruritus at 8
h (P
=
0.003) and 24
h (P
=
0.01). Fewer patients in group G (n
=
8) than group O (n
=
18) required rescue anti-pruritic medication (P
=
0.03). Satisfaction scores were also higher in group G than in group O (P
=
0.03). There was no difference in overall incidence of pruritus, nausea and vomiting, and visual analogue pain scores between the two groups.
Conclusions
Administration of granisetron 3
mg i.v. reduces the severity of pruritus and the use of rescue anti-pruritic medication, and improves satisfaction but does not reduce the overall incidence of pruritus in women who have received subarachnoid morphine 150
μg compared to ondansetron 8
mg i.v.
Keywords: Anaesthesia, obstetric, Intrathecal morphine, Pruritus, Ondansetron, Granisetron
To access this article, please choose from the options below
This work was presented at the Irish Congress of Anaesthesia on 15th May 2008.
PII: S0959-289X(09)00119-8
doi:10.1016/j.ijoa.2009.05.005
© 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Volume 19, Issue 1 , Pages 56-60, January 2010
