International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume 18, Issue 4 , Pages 309-313, October 2009

A retrospective one-year single-centre survey of obstetric red cell transfusions

Department of Obstetric Anaesthesia, Women’s Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK

Accepted 22 May 2009. published online 03 September 2009.

Abstract 

Background

Fears about safety and availability of blood in the United Kingdom have prompted efforts to encourage evidence-based blood transfusion in all areas of medicine, with increasing interest in the obstetric population. A retrospective one-year single-centre audit of obstetric red cell transfusions was conducted.

Methods

Study subjects were those given a red cell transfusion during their perinatal care between April 2006 and March 2007 inclusive. A pre-piloted data collection pro forma was used to collect information from maternity case notes on demographics, location of transfusion, ordering physician, reason for transfusion, counselling, consent, and related laboratory data.

Results

Two-hundred and two women were transfused during their perinatal care (30.8 per 1000 cases), 49% within the first 24h of delivery. A low haemoglobin in the absence of symptoms was the most commonly documented reason for transfusion (43%). Most transfusions (76%) were requested by trainee doctors. Only 9% of patient notes documented that consent for transfusion had been sought and that potential risks were discussed with the patient.

Conclusions

Overall there appeared to be a low threshold for red cell transfusion, with 31% of transfusions occurring despite a haemoglobin >7g/dL and in the absence of ongoing bleeding or symptoms of anaemia. Such transfusions are deemed inappropriate according to the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists guidelines. The main recommendations are to implement an educational programme and guidelines in all obstetric units, reduce blood use and encourage documentation of appropriate consent.

Keywords: Survey, Obstetrics, Red cell transfusion, Education, Guidelines, Consent

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0959-289X(09)00126-5

doi:10.1016/j.ijoa.2009.05.008

International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume 18, Issue 4 , Pages 309-313, October 2009