International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume 19, Issue 1 , Pages 61-66 , January 2010

A double blind comparison of the variability of block levels assessed using a hand help Neurotip™ or a Neuropen® at elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia

,Accepted 9 June 2009.

References 

  1. Yentis SM, Brighouse D, May A, Bogod D, Elton C. Analgesia and anaesthesia in pregnancy. A practical guide. London: WB Saunders; 2001;360–2
  2. Soundararajan N, Russell I. A randomised comparison of a hand-held Neurotip and the Neuropen for assessing loss of touch sensation during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2007;16:202–207
  3. Hollmén A. Axillary plexus block. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1966;Suppl XXI:53–65
  4. Wessa P. Notched Boxplots (v1.0.5) in Free Statistics Software (v1.1.23–r3), Office for Research Development and Education, URL 2008. http://www.wessa.net/rwasp_notchedbox1.wasp/
  5. Garrett L, Nash JC. Issues in teaching the comparison of variability to non-statistics students. J Stat Educ 2001; 9 (2). http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v9n2/garrett.html.
  6. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8:135–160
  7. Congreve K, Gardner I, Laxton C, Scrutton M. Where is T5? A survey of anaesthetists. Anaesthesia. 2006;61:453–455
  8. Paisley AN, Abbott CA, Van Schie CH, Boulton AJ. A comparison of the Neuropen against standard quantitative sensory-threshold measures for assessing peripheral nerve function. Diabet Med. 2002;19:400–405
  9. Jacobs BL. Logical application of cutaneous pinprick sensibility as a screening device for diabetic peripheral neuropathy: overlooked, undervalued and critical in redefining a clinically significant threshold for protective sensation. http://www.medipin.net/argument.htm.
  10. Mukherjee J, Srivastava R, Stocks GM. Assessing the block for caesarean section: what do we mean by touch?. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2003;12(Suppl):S18
  11. Lewis E, Srinivas K, Wilkes AR, Collis RE, Harries SE. Assessing light touch: a new level of confusion!. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2006;15(Suppl):S9
  12. Kocarev M, Akerman N, McLure H, Columb M, Lyons G. Sensory testing for spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: variability and dermatomal separation. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2006;15(Suppl):S9

PII: S0959-289X(09)00129-0

doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2009.06.003

International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume 19, Issue 1 , Pages 61-66 , January 2010