Advertisement
CORRESPONDENCE| Volume 20, ISSUE 4, P359, October 2011

Download started.

Ok

Cardiac output monitoring and fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients

Published:August 12, 2011DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2011.04.007
      We read with interest the report from Piraccini et al. and congratulate them on their management of severe postpartum haemorrhage in a Jehovah’s Witness patient.
      • Piraccini E.
      • Corso R.M.
      • Agnoletti V.
      • Terzitta M.
      • Valtancoli E.
      • Gambale G.
      Cardiac output and fluid replacement in a Jehovah’s Witness with severe postpartum hemorrhage.
      Their management of this difficult scenario was guided largely by the Flotrac/Vigileo cardiac output monitoring system (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA). Specifically, optimization of preload was directed by stroke volume variation (SVV) which occurs due to changes in intrathoracic pressure during the respiratory cycle causing variation in caval blood flow with subsequent effects on preload. SVV has been validated as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in mechanically-ventilated patients in a number of studies.
      • Berkenstadt H.
      • Margalit N.
      • Hadani M.
      • et al.
      Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing brain surgery.
      • Michard F.
      Changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation.
      • Reuter D.A.
      • Kirchner A.
      • Felbinger T.W.
      • et al.
      Usefulness of left ventricular stroke volume variation to assess fluid responsiveness in patients with reduced cardiac function.
      Generally, tidal volumes >8 mL/kg and fixed respiratory rates are specified.
      • Chikhani M.
      • Moppett I.K.
      Minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring: what evidence do we need?.
      The rationale for this is the need for consistent change in intrathoracic pressure from one respiratory cycle to the next, and a sufficiently large change in pressure to cause a measurable change in stroke volume (SV). It is normally calculated using the formula: SVV = ( SV max - SV min ) · SV mean - 1 . Currently the literature does not support the use of SVV in spontaneously-breathing patients as intrathoracic pressure changes are irregular in size and duration.
      • Eyre L.
      • Breen A.
      Optimal volaemic status and predicting fluid responsiveness.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Piraccini E.
        • Corso R.M.
        • Agnoletti V.
        • Terzitta M.
        • Valtancoli E.
        • Gambale G.
        Cardiac output and fluid replacement in a Jehovah’s Witness with severe postpartum hemorrhage.
        Int J Obstet Anesth. 2010; 19: 462-463
        • Berkenstadt H.
        • Margalit N.
        • Hadani M.
        • et al.
        Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing brain surgery.
        Anesth Analg. 2001; 92: 984-989
        • Michard F.
        Changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation.
        Anesthesiology. 2005; 103: 419-428
        • Reuter D.A.
        • Kirchner A.
        • Felbinger T.W.
        • et al.
        Usefulness of left ventricular stroke volume variation to assess fluid responsiveness in patients with reduced cardiac function.
        Crit Care Med. 2003; 31: 1399-1404
        • Chikhani M.
        • Moppett I.K.
        Minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring: what evidence do we need?.
        Br J Anaesth. 2011; 106: 451-453
        • Eyre L.
        • Breen A.
        Optimal volaemic status and predicting fluid responsiveness.
        Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2010; 10: 59-62
        • Monnet X.
        • Teboul J.L.
        Volume responsiveness.
        Curr Opin Crit Care. 2007; 13: 549-553