ORIGINAL ARTICLE| Volume 20, ISSUE 4, P307-311, October 2011

Download started.


Hemodynamic effects of a right lumbar–pelvic wedge during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section

Published:August 18, 2011DOI:



      Aortocaval compression is a major cause of maternal hypotension. A randomized controlled trial was designed to determine the effectiveness of a mechanical intervention using a right lumbar–pelvic wedge in preventing hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery.


      Eighty healthy women undergoing elective cesarean section were randomly allocated immediately after spinal blockade to either a lumbar–pelvic wedge positioned under the right posterior–superior iliac crest (Wedge group, n = 40) or the complete supine position (Supine group, n = 40). Hemodynamic values, vasopressor consumption and adverse effects were collected during the surgical procedure. Hypotension was defined as a reduction in systolic blood pressure of 25% from baseline. Patient allocation, management and data collection were performed by a single unblinded anesthetist.


      There was no difference in the incidence of hypotension between the two groups (42.5% vs. 50%, P = 0.51). During the first 5 min, blood pressure decreased less in the Wedge group. There were significant differences in median [interquartile range] vasopressor requirements between the Wedge group and the Supine group (1 [0–2] vs. 3 [1–4] mg, P < 0.01) and in nausea during the procedure (6 vs. 22 patients, P < 0.01).


      In our study population the use of right lumbar–pelvic wedge was not effective in reducing the incidence of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Patients in whom the wedge was used had higher systolic blood pressure values during the first 5 min of anesthesia and fewer episodes of nausea. The risk of hypotension remains substantial.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


      1. Cyna AM, Andrew M, Emmett RS, Middleton P, Simmons SW. Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(4):CD002251.

        • Morgan P.J.
        • Halpern S.H.
        • Tarshis J.
        The effects of an increase of central blood volume before spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a qualitative systematic review.
        Anesth Analg. 2001; 92: 997-1005
        • Corke B.C.
        • Datta S.
        • Ostheimer G.W.
        • Weiss J.B.
        • Alper M.H.
        Spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section. The influence of hypotension on neonatal outcome.
        Anaesthesia. 1982; 37: 658-662
        • Marx G.F.
        • Cosmi E.V.
        • Wollman S.B.
        Biochemical status and clinical condition of mother and infant at cesarean section.
        Anesth Analg. 1969; 48: 986-994
        • Clark R.
        • Thompson D.
        • Thompson C.
        Prevention of spinal hypotension associated with cesarean section.
        Anesthesiology. 1976; 45: 670-674
        • Rout C.C.R.D.
        Prevention of hypotension following spinal anesthesia for cesarean section.
        Int Anesthesiol Clin. 1994; 32: 117-135
        • Ngan Kee W.D.
        Uteroplacental blood flow.
        in: Chestnut D.H. Polley L.S. Tsen L.C. Wong C.A. Obstetric Anesthesia Principles and Practice. 4th ed. Mosby Elsevier, Philadelphia2009: 37-53
      2. Cluver C, Novikova N, Hofmeyr GJ, Hall DR. Maternal position during caesarean section for preventing maternal and neonatal complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(6):CD007623.

        • Klöhr S.
        • Roth R.
        • Hofmann T.
        • Rossaint R.
        • Heesen M.
        Definitions of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: literature search and application to parturients.
        Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010; 54: 909-921
        • Kampstra P.
        Beanplot: A boxplot alternative for visual comparison of distributions.
        J Stat Softw, Code Snippets. 2008; 28: 1-9
        • Petrie A.
        • Sabin C.
        Methods for clustered data.
        in: Petrie A. Sabin C. Medical Statistics at a Glance. 3rd ed. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, England2009: 124-126
        • Altman D.G.
        Some common problems in medical research.
        in: Altman D.G. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. 1st ed. Chapman & Hall/CRC, London1991: 432-435
      3. Team RDC. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Internet]. Vienna, Austria: Available at: <>; [accessed Feb 2011].

        • Mendonca C.
        • Griffiths J.
        • Ateleanu B.
        • Collis R.E.
        Hypotension following combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia for Caesarean section. Left lateral position vs. tilted supine position.
        Anaesthesia. 2003; 58: 428-431
        • Hartley H.
        • Seed P.
        • Ashworth H.
        • Kubli M.
        • O’Sullivan G.
        • Reynolds F.
        Effect of lateral versus supine wedged position on development of spinal blockade and hypotension.
        Int J Obstet Anesth. 2001; 10: 182-188
        • Rees S.G.
        • Thurlow J.A.
        • Gardner I.C.
        • Scrutton M.J.
        • Kinsella S.M.
        Maternal cardiovascular consequences of positioning after spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section: left 15 degree table tilt vs. left lateral.
        Anaesthesia. 2002; 57: 15-20
        • Lewis N.L.
        • Ritchie E.L.
        • Downer J.P.
        • Nel M.R.
        Left lateral vs. supine, wedged position for development of block after combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section.
        Anaesthesia. 2004; 59: 894-898
        • Kennedy R.L.
        • Friedman D.L.
        • Katchka D.M.
        • Selmants S.
        • Smith R.N.
        Hypotension during obstetrical anesthesia.
        Anesthesiology. 1959; 20: 153-159
        • Crawford J.S.
        • Marilyn B.
        • Davies P.
        Time and lateral tilt at caesarean section.
        Br J Anaesth. 1972; 44: 477-484
        • Matorras R.
        • Tacuri C.
        • Nieto A.
        • Gutierrez de Teran G.
        • Cortes J.
        Lack of benefits of left tilt in emergent cesarean sections: a randomized study of cardiotocography, cord acid–base status and other parameters of the mother and the fetus.
        J Perinat Med. 1998; 26: 284-292
        • Zheng L.
        Effect of blood pressure of cesarean section patients in different postures.
        Chinese Nursing Research. 2001; 15: 325-326
        • Zhou Z.Q.
        • Shao Q.
        • Zeng Q.
        • Song J.
        • Yang J.J.
        Lumbar wedge versus pelvic wedge in preventing hypotension following combined spinal epidural anaesthesia for caesarean delivery.
        Anaesth Intensive Care. 2008; 36: 835-839
        • Brock-Utne J.G.
        • Buley R.J.R.
        • Downing J.W.
        • Cuerden C.
        Advantages of left over right lateral tilt for caesarean section.
        S Afr Med J. 1978; 54: 489-492
        • Rees G.A.D.
        • Willis B.A.
        Resuscitation in late pregnancy.
        Anaesthesia. 1988; 43: 347-349
        • Kinsella S.M.
        • Whitwam J.G.
        • Spencer J.A.
        Reducing aortocaval compression: how much tilt is enough?.
        BMJ. 1992; 305: 539-540
        • Maayan-Metzger A.
        • Schushan-Eisen I.
        • Todris L.
        • Etchin A.
        • Kuint J.
        Maternal hypotension during elective cesarean section and short-term neonatal outcome.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 202: e1-e5
        • Dyer R.A.
        • Reed A.R.
        Spinal hypotension during elective cesarean delivery: closer to a solution.
        Anesth Analg. 2011; 111: 1093-1095
        • Allen T.K.
        • George R.B.
        • White W.D.
        • Muir H.A.
        • Habib A.S.
        A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of four fixed rate infusion regimens of phenylephrine for hemodynamic support during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery.
        Anesth Analg. 2010; 111: 1221-1229
        • Bamber J.H.
        • Dresner M.
        Aortocaval compression in pregnancy: the effect of changing the degree and direction of lateral tilt on maternal cardiac output.
        Anesth Analg. 2003; 97: 256-258
      4. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Cesarean section guidelines. National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health. Available at: <>; [accessed Feb 2011].

      5. Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists. Hypotension during regional anaesthesia for caesarean birth. Available at: <>; [accessed Feb 2011].