Advertisement
Case report| Volume 20, ISSUE 4, P351-354, October 2011

Download started.

Ok

Use of a 23-gauge continuous spinal catheter for labor analgesia: A case series

  • W. Tao
    Correspondence
    Correspondence to: W. Tao, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390-9068, USA.
    Affiliations
    Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • A.P. Nguyen
    Affiliations
    Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • B.O. Ogunnaike
    Affiliations
    Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • M.G. Craig
    Affiliations
    Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
    Search for articles by this author
Published:September 12, 2011DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2011.07.010

      Abstract

      Seven women received labor analgesia with 0.125% bupivacaine and fentanyl 2 μg/mL delivered through a new generation of over-the-needle 23-gauge spinal catheters. The first patient was managed with intermittent bolus injections but inadequate pain control prompted a conversion to a continuous infusion for subsequent patients. One patient developed a postdural puncture headache following catheterization for 5 h, but there were no headaches in those who had an indwelling catheter for 8 h or longer. In one patient the catheter was also used to provide anesthesia for cesarean delivery with 0.5% bupivacaine and fentanyl 20 μg. The largest drop in mean arterial blood pressure was 34% which occurred during the intermittent dosing period in the first patient. The mean blood pressure decrease was <25% in the remaining patients. One patient with labor lasting over 17 h developed pain and paresthesia that resolved in 24 h without treatment. Two patients had motor block that necessitated a temporary reduction in rate or discontinuation of the infusion. The continuous spinal catheter appeared to be acceptable to patients but the optimal choice of drugs, concentration, and mode of administration remains to be determined.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Palmer C.M.
        Continuous spinal anesthesia and analgesia in obstetrics.
        Anesth Analg. 2010; 111: 1476-1479
        • Imbelloni L.E.
        • Gouveia M.A.
        Continuous spinal anesthesia with Spinocath® for obstetric analgesia.
        Int J Obstet Anesth. 2006; 15: 171-172
        • Alonso E.
        • Gilsanz F.
        • Gredilla E.
        • Martínez B.
        • Canser E.
        • Alsina E.
        Observational study of continuous spinal anesthesia with the catheter-over-needle technique for cesarean delivery.
        Int J Obstet Anesth. 2009; 18: 137-141
        • Ginosar Y.
        • Davidson E.M.
        • Firman N.
        • Meroz Y.
        • Lemmens H.
        • Weiniger C.F.
        A randomized controlled trial using patient-controlled epidural analgesia with 0.25% versus 0.0625% bupivacaine in nulliparous labor: effect on analgesia requirement and maternal satisfaction.
        Int J Obstet Anesth. 2010; 19: 171-178
        • Arkoosh V.A.
        • Palmer C.M.
        • Yun E.M.
        • et al.
        A randomized, double-masked, multicenter comparison of the safety of continuous intrathecal labor analgesia using a 28-gauge catheter versus continuous epidural labor analgesia.
        Anesthesiology. 2008; 108: 286-298
        • Macarthur A.
        Postpartum Headacahe.
        in: Chestnut D.H. Polley L.S. Tsen L.C. Wong C.A. Chestnut’s Obstetric Anesthesia. Principles and Practice. 4th ed. Mosby Elsevier, Philadelphia2009: 677-700
        • Apfel C.C.
        • Saxena A.
        • Cakmakkaya O.S.
        • Gaiser R.
        • George E.
        • Radke O.
        Prevention of postdural puncture headache after accidental dural puncture: a quantitative systematic review.
        Br J Anaesth. 2010; 105: 255-263