Advertisement
Original Article| Volume 39, P12-21, August 2019

Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia in labour: six-year audit of outcome data of the RemiPCA SAFE Network (2010–2015)

Published:December 21, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2018.12.004

      Highlights

      • Analysis of a remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) database.
      • RemiPCA SAFE Network has monitored clinical use of remifentanil PCA since 2009.
      • 5740 remifentanil PCA applications at 31 hospitals analysed between 2010 and 2015.
      • No need for maternal ventilation or cardiopulmonary resuscitation was reported.
      • Remifentanil PCA applied within the context of the network is safe and effective.

      Abstract

      Background

      The RemiPCA SAFE Network was established to set standards and monitor maternal and neonatal outcomes when using remifentanil for labour analgesia. The aim of this analysis was to describe the development of the network standard and to report maternal and neonatal outcome data, including severe adverse events.

      Methods

      Data sets of the RemiPCA SAFE Network database from the initial six consecutive years (2010–2015) were retrospectively analysed. The data were analysed on an annual basis and set in context with changes of the network standard, i.e. adaptations of the network’s standard operating procedure. Main outcomes reported are maternal and neonatal data regarding effectiveness and safety, such as satisfaction, need for bag/mask ventilation and/or cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

      Results

      Among 5740 data sets, no need for maternal ventilation or cardiopulmonary resuscitation was registered. Neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitations, potentially related to remifentanil, occurred in 0.3%. In parallel with adaptations of the network standard, a moderate rate of maternal hypoxia (oxygen saturation <94% in 24.7%) was found, together with a low rate of supplemental oxygen requirement in neonates (5.0%).

      Conclusion

      The RemiPCA SAFE Network data show that remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia can be applied safely. There is bias when data from real clinical settings are analysed retrospectively. Notwithstanding, the approach taken by the RemiPCA SAFE Network, with constant, systematic and standardised evaluation of multiple parameters during the course of labour, might identify trends and anomalies and guide the development and application of safety standards, when translating knowledge from scientific trials into clinical practice.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Jones R.
        • Pegrum A.
        • Stacey R.G.
        Patient-controlled analgesia using remifentanil in the parturient with thrombocytopaenia.
        Anaesthesia. 1999; 54: 461-465
        • Hill D.
        Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia should be routinely available for use in labour.
        Int J Obstet Anesth. 2008; 17: 336-339
        • Tveit T.O.
        • Halvorsen A.
        • Seiler S.
        • Rosland J.H.
        Efficacy and side effects of intravenous remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia used in a stepwise approach for labour: an observational study.
        Int J Obstet Anesth. 2013; 22: 19-25
        • Bonner J.C.
        • McClymont W.
        Respiratory arrest in an obstetric patient using remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia.
        Anaesthesia. 2012; 67: 538-540
        • Kinney M.A.
        • Rose C.H.
        • Traynor K.D.
        • et al.
        Emergency bedside cesarean delivery: lessons learned in teamwork and patient safety.
        BMC Res Notes. 2012; 5: 412
        • Marr R.
        • Hyams J.
        • Bythell V.
        Cardiac arrest in an obstetric patient using remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia.
        Anaesthesia. 2013; 68: 283-287
        • Pruefer C.
        • Bewlay A.
        Respiratory arrest with remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia–another case.
        Anaesthesia. 2012; 67: 1044-1045
        • Stocki D.
        • Matot I.
        • Einav S.
        • Eventov-Friedman S.
        • Ginosar Y.
        • Weiniger C.F.
        A randomized controlled trial of the efficacy and respiratory effects of patient-controlled intravenous remifentanil analgesia and patient-controlled epidural analgesia in laboring women.
        Anesth Analg. 2014; 118: 589-597
        • Melber A.A.
        • Sia A.T.H.
        “Do no harm” – Where to place remifentanil for labour analgesia?.
        Trends Anaesth Crit Care. 2017; 2017: 17-20
        • Wilson M.J.A.
        • MacArthur C.
        • Hewitt C.A.
        • et al.
        Intravenous remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia versus intramuscular pethidine for pain relief in labour (RESPITE): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.
        Lancet. 2018; 392: 662-672
        • Weibel S.
        • Jelting Y.
        • Afshari A.
        • et al.
        Patient-controlled analgesia with remifentanil versus alternative parenteral methods for pain management in labour.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 4: CD011989
        • Van de Velde M.
        • Carvalho B.
        Remifentanil for labor analgesia: an evidence-based narrative review.
        Int J Obstet Anesth. 2016; 25: 66-74
        • Wyckoff M.H.
        • Aziz K.
        • Escobedo M.B.
        • et al.
        Part 13: Neonatal resuscitation: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.
        Circulation. 2015; 132: S543-S560
        • Trevisanuto D.
        • Cavallin F.
        • Nguyen L.N.
        • et al.
        Supreme laryngeal mask airway versus face mask during neonatal resuscitation: a randomized controlled trial.
        J Pediatr. 2015; 167 (286–91.e1)
        • Volmanen P.
        • Sarvela J.
        • Akural E.I.
        • Raudaskoski T.
        • Korttila K.
        • Alahuhta S.
        Intravenous remifentanil vs. epidural levobupivacaine with fentanyl for pain relief in early labour: a randomised, controlled, double-blinded study.
        Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008; 52: 249-255
        • Meissner W.
        • Mescha S.
        • Rothaug J.
        • et al.
        Quality improvement in postoperative pain management: results from the QUIPS project.
        Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2008; 105: 865-870