Advertisement
Original Article| Volume 53, 103623, February 2023

Evaluation of ultrasound airway assessment parameters in pregnant patients and their comparison with that of non-pregnant women: a prospective cohort study

Published:December 28, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2022.103623

      Highlights

      • Pregnancy alters airway anatomy and physiology, making airway management difficult.
      • We compared ultrasound airway parameters between pregnant and non-pregnant.
      • Most ultrasound-assessed airway parameters were significantly different between them.
      • The pre-E and pre-E/E-VC ratio moderately predict a difficult airway in pregnancy.
      • Pregnancy, hyoid bone visibility and pre-E/E-VC ratio were independent predictors.

      Abstract

      Background

      Clinical airway assessment parameters differ significantly between pregnant and non-pregnant patients, however literature comparing their ultrasound (US) airway parameters is limited. We planned a prospective cohort study to compare US-assessed airway parameters between pregnant and non-pregnant women.

      Methods

      We enrolled 82 pregnant females scheduled for elective cesarean section under neuraxial anesthesia and 80 age-matched non-pregnant females scheduled for elective surgery. Pre-operative clinical airway assessment was performed in both groups. The US airway assessment was done pre-operatively in non-pregnant and postoperatively in pregnant patients. Our primary objective was to compare US-assessed parameters, and secondary objectives included a comparison of clinical airway assessment parameters and investigating a relationship between a difficult airway (defined as a modified Mallampati grade (MMG) ≥ 3) and other airway assessment parameters.

      Results

      Among several US airway parameters, pregnant patients had significantly higher hyomental distance, anterior neck soft tissue thickness at the hyoid and vocal cord level, and oral cavity height, while the tongue thickness and mandibular condylar movements were significantly lower than in non-pregnant patients. Similarly, for the clinical airway assessment, pregnant patients had significantly higher MMG and upper lip bite test scores, mentohyoid distance, and neck circumference. Pregnancy, the ratio of pre-epiglottic space and epiglottis-to-vocal cords distance (Pre-E/E-VC), and hyoid bone visibility were independent predictors of a difficult airway.

      Conclusion

      The US airway assessment parameters differ significantly between pregnant and non-pregnant patients. Pregnancy, hyoid bone visibility, and Pre-E/E-VC ratio were independent predictors of the difficult airway in female patients.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Rocke D.A.
        • Murray W.B.
        • Rout C.C.
        • Gouws E.
        Relative risk analysis of factors associated with difficult intubation in obstetric anesthesia.
        Anesthesiology. 1992; 77: 67-73https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199207000-00010
        • Kodali B.S.
        • Datta S.
        Airway changes during labor and delivery.
        Anesthesiology. 2008; 108: 357-362https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e31816452d3
        • Hawkins J.L.
        • Chang J.
        • Palmer S.K.
        • Gibbs C.P.
        • Callaghan W.M.
        Anesthesia-related maternal mortality in the United States: 1979–2002.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 117: 69-74https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820093a9
        • Tse J.C.
        • Rimm E.B.
        • Hussain A.
        Predicting difficult endotracheal intubation in surgical patients scheduled for general anesthesia: a prospective blind study.
        Anesth Analg. 1995; 81: 254-258https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-199508000-00008
        • Rose D.K.
        • Cohen M.M.
        The incidence of airway problems depends on the definition used.
        Can J Anaesth. 1996; 43: 30-34https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03015954
        • Abdallah F.W.
        • Yu E.
        • Cholvisudhi P.
        • et al.
        Is ultrasound a valid and reliable imaging modality for airway evaluation? An observational computed tomographic validation study using submandibular scanning of the mouth and oropharynx: validation of airway ultrasound.
        J Ultrasound Med. 2017; 36: 49-59https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.16.01083
        • Hawthorne L.
        • Wilson R.
        • Lyons G.
        • Dresner M.
        Failed intubation revisited: 17-yr experience in a teaching maternity unit.
        Br J Anaesth. 1996; 76: 680-684https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/76.5.680
        • Xu L.
        • Dai S.
        • Sun L.
        • Shen J.
        • Lv C.
        • Chen X.
        Evaluation of 2 ultrasonic indicators as predictors of difficult laryngoscopy in pregnant women: A prospective, double blinded study.
        Medicine. 2020; 99: e18305
        • Erdem Solak H.
        • Yılmaz C.
        • Karasu D.
        • et al.
        Ultrasound measurements of anterior neck soft tissue thickness to predict difficult laryngoscopy in pregnant patients.
        Cukurova Med J. 2022; 47: 800-810https://doi.org/10.17826/cumj.1025164
        • Çigdem U.K.
        • Erkoç M.F.
        • Talih G.
        The measurement of skin to epiglottis length for difficult airway prediction by ultrasonography in obese pregnant women: Prospective cohort study.
        J Surg Med. 2019; 3: 759-762https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.605123
        • Healy D.W.
        • La Hart E.J.
        • Peoples E.E.
        • Jewell E.S.
        • Bettendorf Jr, R.J.
        • Ramachandran S.K.
        A comparison of the Mallampati evaluation in neutral or extended cervical spine positions: a retrospective observational study of >80 000 patients.
        Br J Anaesth. 2016; 116: 690-698https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aew056
        • Mushambi M.C.
        • Athanassoglou V.
        • Kinsella S.M.
        Anticipated difficult airway during obstetric general anesthesia: narrative literature review and management recommendations.
        Obstet Anesth Dig. 2021; 41: 54-55https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15007
      1. Chauhan G, Tadi P. Physiology, postpartum changes. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK555904/].

        • Mani S.
        Guidelines for ultrasound owners and owners of clinics, diagnostic centres, nursing homes and hospitals.
        Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2012; 22: 125-128https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.101102
        • Petrisor C.
        • Szabo R.
        • Constantinescu C.
        • Prie A.
        • Hagau N.
        Ultrasound-based assessment of hyomental distances in neutral, ramped, and maximum hyperextended positions, and derived ratios, for the prediction of difficult airway in the obese population: a pilot diagnostic accuracy study.
        Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2018; 50: 110-116https://doi.org/10.5603/AIT.2018.0017
        • Andruszkiewicz P.
        • Wojtczak J.
        • Sobczyk D.
        • Stach O.
        • Kowalik I.
        Effectiveness and validity of Sonographic upper airway evaluation to predict difficult laryngoscopy.
        J Ultrasound Med. 2016; 35: 2243-2252https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.15.11098
        • Hui C.M.
        • Tsui B.C.
        Sublingual ultrasound as an assessment method for predicting difficult intubation: a pilot study.
        Anaesthesia. 2014; 69: 314-319https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.12598
        • Carsetti A.
        • Sorbello M.
        • Adrario E.
        • Donati A.
        • Falcetta S.
        Airway ultrasound as predictor of difficult direct laryngoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Anesth Analg. 2022; 134: 740-750https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000005839
        • Gomes S.H.
        • Simões A.M.
        • Nunes A.M.
        • et al.
        Useful ultrasonographic parameters to predict difficult laryngoscopy and difficult tracheal intubation - a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Front Med (Lausanne). 2021; 8671658https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.671658
        • Sotoodehnia M.
        • Rafiemanesh H.
        • Mirfazaelian H.
        • Safaie A.
        • Baratloo A.
        Ultrasonography indicators for predicting difficult intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        BMC Emerg Med. 2021; 21: 76https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-021-00472-w
        • Gupta D.
        • Srirajakalidindi A.
        • Ittiara B.
        • Apple L.
        • Toshniwal G.
        • Haber H.
        Ultrasonographic modification of Cormack Lehane classification for pre-anesthetic airway assessment.
        Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2012; 21 (PMID: 23634565): 835-842
        • Rana S.
        • Verma V.
        • Bhandari S.
        • Sharma S.
        • Koundal V.
        • Chaudhary S.K.
        Point of care ultrasound in the airway assessment: a correlation of ultrasonography guided parameters to the Cormack-Lehane classification.
        Saudi J Anaesth. 2018; 12: 292-296https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_540_17
        • Koundal V.
        • Rana S.
        • Thakur R.
        • Chauhan V.
        • Ekke S.
        • Kumar M.
        The usefulness of point of care ultrasound (POCUS) in preanaesthetic airway assessment.
        Indian J Anaesth. 2019; 63: 1022-1028https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_492_19
        • Yao W.
        • Zhou Y.
        • Wang B.
        • et al.
        Can mandibular condylar mobility sonography measurements predict difficult laryngoscopy?.
        Anesth Analg. 2017; 124: 800-806https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000001528