Advertisement
Controversies in obstetric anaesthesia Three debates held on 21 March 1995 at the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, UK| Volume 5, ISSUE 1, P57-58, January 1996

Download started.

Ok

Controversies in obstetric anaesthesia Three debates held on 21 March 1995 at the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, UK

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-289X(96)80076-8
Previous ArticleEpidural opioids in labour introduce more problems than the solve
Next ArticleEpidural infusions in labour should be abandoned in favour of patient-controlled epidural analgesia
      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Register: Create an account
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Brockway M.S
        • Noble D.W
        • Sharwood-Smith G.H
        • McClure J.H
        Profound respiratory depression after extradural fentanyl.
        Br J Anaesth. 1990; 64: 243-245
        • Ewah B
        • Yau K
        • King M
        • Reynolds F
        • Carson R.J
        • Morgan B
        Effects of epidural opioids on gastric emptying in labour.
        International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia. 1993; 2: 125-128
        • Vertommen J.D
        • Vandermeulen E
        • Van Aken H
        • et al.
        The effects of the addition of sufentanil to 0.125% bupivacaine on the quality of analgesia during labor and on the incidence of instrumental deliveries.
        Anesthesiology. 1991; 74: 809-814
        • Celleno D
        • Capogna G
        Epidural fentanyl plus bupivacaine 0.125% for labour: analgesic effects.
        Can J Anaesth. 1988; 35: 375-378
        • Reynolds F
        • O'Sullivan G
        Epidural fentanyl and perineal pain in labour.
        Anaesthesia. 1989; 44: 341-344
        • Phillips G
        Continuous infusion epidural analgesia in labor: the effect of adding sufentanil to 0.125% bupivacaine.
        Anesth Analg. 1988; 67: 462-465
        • Chestnut D.H
        • Owen C.L
        • Bates J.N
        • Ostman L.G
        • Choi W.W
        • Geiger M.W
        Continuous infusion epidural analgesia during labor:a randomized, double-blind comparison of 0.0625% bupivacaine/0.0002% fentanyl versus 0.125% bupivacaine.
        Anesthesiology. 1988; 68: 754-759
        • Murphy J.D
        • Henderson K
        • Bowden M.I
        • Lewis M
        • Cooper G.M
        Bupivacaine versus bupivacaine plus fentanyl for epidural analgesia: effect on maternal satistaction.
        BMJ. 1991; 302: 564-567
        • Thorp J.A
        • Hu D.H
        • Albin R.M
        • et al.
        The effect of intrapartum epidural analgesia on nulliparous labor: a randomized, controlled, prospective trial.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 69: 851-858
        • Morgan B.M
        • Bulpitt C.J
        • Clifton P.J
        Analgesia and satisfaction in childbirth (the Queen Charlotte's 1000 mother survey).
        Lancet. 1982; (October 9): 808-810
        • MacArthur C
        • Lewis M
        • Knox E.G
        • Crawford J.S
        Epidural anaesthesia and long-term backache after childbirth.
        BMJ. 1990; 301: 9-12
        • Matthews N.C
        • Corser G
        Epidural fentanyl for shaking in obstetrics.
        Anaesthesia. 1988; 43: 783-785

      Article info

      Identification

      DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-289X(96)80076-8

      Copyright

      © 1996 Published by Elsevier Inc.

      ScienceDirect

      Access this article on ScienceDirect

      The content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals.


      We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. To update your cookie settings, please visit the Cookie Preference Center for this site.
      Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. except certain content provided by third parties.


      RELX