Controversies continued

References

1. 3rd edn. The Patient's Charter and You. Department of Health, 1995 (F82/005 1687)
   • Google Scholar
2. • Morgan M
   Obstetrical anaesthesia.
   in: Chamberlain G Wraight A Steer P Pain and its relief in childbirth. The results of a national survey conducted by the National Birthday Trust. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh1993: 69-77
   • Google Scholar
3. • Department of Health and Social Security
   Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in England and Wales, 1970–1972. HMSO, London1975
   • Google Scholar
4. • Department of Health and Social Security
   Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in England and Wales, 1973–1975. HMSO, London1979
   • Google Scholar
5. • Department of Health and Social Security
   Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in England and Wales, 1967–1978. HMSO, London1982
   • Google Scholar
6. • Department of Health and others
   Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom 1985–1987. HMSO, London1991
   • Google Scholar
7. • Department of Health and others
   Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom 1988–1990. HMSO, London1994
   • Google Scholar
8. • Bromage P.R
   Neurologic complications of regional anesthesia for obstetrics.
   in: Shnider S.M Levinson G Anesthesia for Obstetrics. 3rd edn. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore1993: 433-453
   • Google Scholar
9. • Cotler M
   • Katz R
   Consent.
   in: Scott W.E Vickers M.D Draper H Ethical issues in anaesthesia. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford1994: 33-49
   • Google Scholar

10. Holdcroft A, Parshall A M, Knowles M G, Waite K E, Morgan B M. Factors associated with mothers selecting general anaesthesia for lower segment caesarean section. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology. In press.

    • Google Scholar
11. • Welton T.S.W
    The past, present and future of spinal anesthesia.
    Am Surg. 1928; : 633-636
    • Google Scholar
12. • Cope R.W
    The Woolley & Roe Case. Woolley & Roe versus Ministry of Health and others.
    Anaesthesia. 1945; 9: 249-270
    • Scopus (54)
    • Crossref
    • Google Scholar