Skip to Main Content
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT



Property Value
Status
Version
Ad File
Disable Ads Flag
Environment
Moat Init
Moat Ready
Contextual Ready
Contextual URL
Contextual Initial Segments
Contextual Used Segments
AdUnit
SubAdUnit
Custom Targeting
Ad Events
Invalid Ad Sizes
Advertisement
International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Close
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Back
    • Articles in Press
    • Current Issue
    • List of Issues
    • Special Issues
    • Supplements
  • View for Free
    • Back
    • Editor's Choice
    • Editorials
    • Reviews
    • Abstracts of OAA meetings
    • SOAP 
  • Calendar of Events
  • For Authors
    • Back
    • About Open Access 
    • Author Information
    • Author Services 
    • Permissions
    • Submit a Manuscript 
  • Journal Info
    • Back
    • About the Journal
    • About Open Access 
    • Activate Online Access
    • Career Opportunities 
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Information for Advertisers 
    • New Content Alerts
    • Reprints 
  • OAA 
  • SOAP 
  • More Periodicals
    • Back
    • Find a Periodical
    • Go to Product Catalog
Advanced searchSave search

Please enter a term before submitting your search.

Ok
  • Submit
  • Log in
  • Register
  • Log in
    • Submit
    • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Claim
Skip menu
    x

    Filter:

    Filters applied

    • Editor
    • Research ArticleRemove Research Article filter
    Clear all

    Article Type

    • Review Article5
    • Editorial2
    • Rapid Communication1

    Publication Date

    • Last Year1
    • Last 2 Years2
    • Last 5 Years7
    Please choose a date range between 2019 and 2022.

    Author

    • An, GH1
    • Biasini, FJ1
    • Blanchard, CT1
    • Casey, BM1
    • Chen, QM1
    • Cohen, J1
    • Dang, JJ1
    • Eley, VA1
    • Han, N-LR1
    • Harper, LM1
    • Hodsdon, A1
    • Jafra, A1
    • Kimble, RMN1
    • Lee, J1
    • Liu, N1
    • Makkar, JK1
    • Melhuish, TM1
    • Monks, DT1
    • Onwochei, DN1
    • Powell, MF1
    • Robbins, LS1
    • Rowell, J1
    • Salter, A1
    • Sia, ATH1
    • Singh, NP1

    Journal

    • International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia7

    Keyword

    • Anaesthesia, general1
    • Analgesia1
    • Boosting1
    • Breakthrough pain1
    • Caesarean section1
    • Carbetocin1
    • Cesarean delivery1
    • Coagulation1
    • Elective caesarean1
    • Elective caesarean deliveries1
    • Epidural analgesia1
    • General anesthesia1
    • Intrathecal fentanyl1
    • Labor1
    • Labouring women1
    • Machine learning1
    • Meta-analysis1
    • Motor delay1
    • Neurodevelopment1
    • Non-labouring women1
    • Opioids1
    • Patient-controlled epidural analgesia1
    • Postpartum haemorrhage1
    • Prolonged second stage of labor1
    • Pruritus1

    Access Filter

    • Open Access

    Editor's Choice Articles

    7 Results
    Subscribe to collection
    • Export
      • PDF
      • Citation

    Please select at least one article in order to proceed.

    Ok
    FilterHide Filter
    • Original Article

      The incidence of breakthrough pain associated with programmed intermittent bolus volumes for labor epidural analgesia: a randomized controlled trial

      International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
      Vol. 51103571Published online: July 1, 2022
      • R.H. Zuo
      • J.J. Dang
      • J.W. Zhuang
      • Q.M. Chen
      • J.Y. Zhang
      • H.W. Zheng
      • and others
      Cited in Scopus: 0
      • Preview Hide Preview
      • Download PDF
      • Export Citation
        Maintenance of epidural labor analgesia using programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) may be superior to continuous epidural infusion (CEI) analgesia in respects such as reducing the use of local anesthetic, improving the quality of analgesia, reducing motor block, and improving maternal satisfaction.1–4 In previous studies the incidence of breakthrough pain, defined as the woman complaining of pain or stress requiring supplemental treatment, was as high as 62.3%.5 Breakthrough pain may adversely affect the maternal labor experience.
        The incidence of breakthrough pain associated with programmed intermittent bolus volumes for labor epidural analgesia: a randomized controlled trial
      • Original Article

        The effect of two groups of intrathecal fentanyl doses on analgesic outcomes and adverse effects in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis

        International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
        Vol. 50103270Published online: February 8, 2022
        • N.P. Singh
        • J.K. Makkar
        • A. Jafra
        • P. Verma
        • P. Mohinder Singh
        Cited in Scopus: 0
        • Preview Hide Preview
        • Download PDF
        • Export Citation
          Cesarean delivery (CD) is one of the most common surgical procedures worldwide,1 mainly performed under spinal anesthesia. The addition of intrathecal opioids to local anesthetics for spinal anesthesia helps improve analgesia in the intra-operative and postoperative periods.2 Intrathecal morphine is recognized as a gold standard to provide a prolonged duration of postoperative analgesia.3 However, the drug has a delayed onset of action and cannot provide intra-operative analgesia.4,5 Further, there is limited availability of preservative-free morphine in developing countries, so it is common to use short-acting intrathecal opioids like fentanyl instead of morphine to enhance peri-operative analgesia after CD.
          The effect of two groups of intrathecal fentanyl doses on analgesic outcomes and adverse effects in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis
        • Original Article

          General anesthesia for cesarean delivery and childhood neurodevelopmental and perinatal outcomes: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial

          International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
          Vol. 45p34–40Published online: August 25, 2020
          • L.S. Robbins
          • C.T. Blanchard
          • F.J. Biasini
          • M.F. Powell
          • B.M. Casey
          • A.T. Tita
          • and others
          Cited in Scopus: 3
          • Preview Hide Preview
          • Download PDF
          • Export Citation
            Approximately 7% of all cesarean deliveries and 18% of preterm cesarean deliveries in the USA require the use of general anesthesia, with earlier gestational age being associated with a greater use of general anesthesia.1,2 In 2016, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a statement expressing concern that pediatric neurodevelopment may be affected negatively by exposure to anesthesia or sedation in the third trimester of pregnancy or before three years of age.3 The FDA acknowledged that a single, short exposure may not have an effect, but the report called for research to characterize the impact of exposure to general anesthesia on neurodevelopment.
            General anesthesia for cesarean delivery and childhood neurodevelopmental and perinatal outcomes: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial
          • Original Article

            Prediction of breakthrough pain during labour neuraxial analgesia: comparison of machine learning and multivariable regression approaches

            International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
            Vol. 45p99–110Published online: August 25, 2020
            • H.S. Tan
            • N. Liu
            • R. Sultana
            • N-L.R. Han
            • C.W. Tan
            • J. Zhang
            • and others
            Cited in Scopus: 8
            • Preview Hide Preview
            • Download PDF
            • Export Citation
              Epidural analgesia has excellent clinical efficacy and safety and is the gold standard for labour pain relief.1 However, effective analgesia is dependent on the interplay of obstetric factors, anaesthetic variables, and labour progression. Hence, an estimated 0.9%–25%2–6 of parturients experience breakthrough pain,2 with an adverse impact on satisfaction and healthcare workload. Accurate a priori identification of parturients at risk for breakthrough pain would facilitate individualised risk-counselling and optimisation of labour analgesia.
              Prediction of breakthrough pain during labour neuraxial analgesia: comparison of machine learning and multivariable regression approaches
            • Original Article

              Baseline parameters for rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) in healthy pregnant Australian women: a comparison of labouring and non-labouring women at term

              International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
              Vol. 41p7–13Published online: November 18, 2019
              • J. Lee
              • K.H. Wyssusek
              • R.M.N. Kimble
              • M. Way
              • A.A. van Zundert
              • J. Cohen
              • and others
              Cited in Scopus: 4
              • Preview Hide Preview
              • Download PDF
              • Export Citation
                Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM®; Instrumentation Laboratory™, Munich, Germany) is a point-of-care visco-elastic test of coagulation that is well established in hepatic and cardiac surgery, obstetrics and trauma.1,2 Women become more hypercoagulable as pregnancy progresses through the three trimesters and this has been measured by both thromboelastography and rotational thromboelastometry in uncomplicated pregnancies.3 To date there has been a paucity of substantial, well-researched reference ranges for ROTEM® in pregnant labouring and non-labouring women.
                Baseline parameters for rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) in healthy pregnant Australian women: a comparison of labouring and non-labouring women at term
              • Original Article

                Carbetocin reduces the need for additional uterotonics in elective caesarean delivery: a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials

                International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
                Vol. 40p14–23Published online: June 24, 2019
                • D.N. Onwochei
                • J. Van Ross
                • PM. Singh
                • A. Salter
                • D.T. Monks
                Cited in Scopus: 14
                • Preview Hide Preview
                • Download PDF
                • Export Citation
                  Primary postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is a major cause of morbidity and the leading cause of direct maternal death worldwide,1 with uterine atony accounting for approximately 70% of cases.2 Oxytocin is the most commonly used uterotonic in the developed world, with recent Cochrane reviews showing that it is effective for treating PPH.3,4 However, failure of PPH prophylaxis with oxytocin, as shown by the need for a rescue uterotonic, has been demonstrated to be as high as 13% in women having an elective caesarean delivery (CD).
                  Carbetocin reduces the need for additional uterotonics in elective caesarean delivery: a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials
                • Original Article

                  Induction opioids for caesarean section under general anaesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

                  International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
                  Vol. 40p4–13Published online: May 14, 2019
                  • L.D. White
                  • A. Hodsdon
                  • G.H. An
                  • C. Thang
                  • T.M. Melhuish
                  • R. Vlok
                  Cited in Scopus: 22
                  • Preview Hide Preview
                  • Download PDF
                  • Export Citation
                    Caesarean section (CS) under general anaesthesia (GA) is commonly performed due to surgical urgency, inadequate previous block, maternal refusal or contraindication to neuraxial anaesthesia.1 The induction of general anaesthesia and initial surgical incisions cause significant sympathetic drive which may result in adverse effects, for example intracranial haemorrhage in the context of comorbidities such as pre-eclampsia.2–5 For this reason sympatholysis is often required on induction of GA and initiation of CS.
                    Induction opioids for caesarean section under general anaesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
                  Page 1 of 1

                  Login to your account

                  Show
                  Forgot password?
                  Don’t have an account?
                  Create a Free Account

                  If you don't remember your password, you can reset it by entering your email address and clicking the Reset Password button. You will then receive an email that contains a secure link for resetting your password

                  If the address matches a valid account an email will be sent to __email__ with instructions for resetting your password

                  Cancel
                  • Home
                  • Articles & Issues
                  • Articles in Press
                  • Current Issue
                  • List of Issues
                  • Special Issues
                  • Supplements
                  • View for Free
                  • Editor's Choice
                  • Editorials
                  • Reviews
                  • Abstracts of OAA meetings
                  • Calendar of Events
                  • For Authors
                  • About Open Access
                  • Author Information
                  • Author Services
                  • Permissions
                  • Submit a Manuscript
                  • Journal Info
                  • About the Journal
                  • About Open Access
                  • Activate Online Access
                  • Career Opportunities
                  • Contact Us
                  • Editorial Board
                  • Information for Advertisers
                  • New Content Alerts
                  • Reprints
                  • OAA
                  • More Periodicals
                  • Find a Periodical
                  • Go to Product Catalog

                  The content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals.



                  We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. To update your cookie settings, please visit the Cookie Preference Center for this site.
                  Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. except certain content provided by third parties.

                  • Privacy Policy  
                  • Terms and Conditions  
                  • Accessibility  
                  • Help & Contact

                  RELX